World Council For Medical Tourism

Report

The importance of having attorney arbitrators in medical arbitrations cannot be overstated

Here are several key reasons why their involvement is crucial: 1. Legal Expertise: Attorney arbitrators bring a deep understanding of the law and legal principles, which is vital in navigating the complexities of medical disputes. Their expertise helps ensure that the arbitration process adheres to relevant legal standards and regulations. 2. Understanding of Medical Standards: Many attorney arbitrators have experience with international medical malpractice laws and standards of care, and its applicability and enforcement in other countries. Something physicians typically do not. This background equips them to assess the nuances of medical cases more effectively then arbitrators without legal training. 3. Procedural Knowledge: Attorney arbitrators are well-versed in arbitration international procedures and rules, enabling them to manage the process efficiently. Their familiarity with procedural norms helps streamline proceedings, minimize delays, and enhance the overall effectiveness of the arbitration. 4. Impartiality and Fairness: Having attorneys as arbitrators can foster a perception of impartiality and fairness in the arbitration process. Their commitment to ethical standards helps maintain the integrity of the arbitration, reassuring parties that their case will be heard objectively. 5. Effective Communication: Attorney arbitrators excel in articulating legal concepts and explaining decisions. Their ability to convey complex information clearly is invaluable in ensuring that all parties understand the reasoning behind the arbitrator’s decisions. 6. Facilitating Settlement: Experienced attorney arbitrators are often skilled negotiators who can help facilitate discussions between parties. Their presence can encourage settlements by providing legal insights that align with realistic outcomes based on the merits of the case. 7. Navigating Ethical Concerns: Medical arbitrations often involve ethical issues and conflicts of interest. Attorney arbitrators are trained to recognize and address these concerns, helping maintain the integrity of the arbitration process. 8. Finality of Decisions: The decisions made by attorney arbitrators are typically respected due to their legal expertise. This finality is crucial in medical disputes, where parties seek resolution without the lengthy process of going to court. In summary, the inclusion of attorney arbitrators in medical arbitrations significantly enhances the process’s legal rigor, efficiency, and fairness, ultimately leading to a more just resolution for all parties involved.

The importance of having attorney arbitrators in medical arbitrations cannot be overstated Read More »

Fatal outcomes and a conflicting legal system. Expert Witness for medical malpractice case: The Medical Board!

Tijuana, Mexico Z Case:  Summary: a young woman from New York City goes to Tijuana for a gastric sleeve surgery before her wedding; the physician accidentally ruptures her esophagus, and she is sent back to New York City while bleeding internally. She underwent several surgeries back in the USA trying to repair the damage and died in the hospital 2 months later.  Her family filed a lawsuit for medical practice, but after 3 years of litigating the case, the Court called an expert witness to determine if the doctor was at fault. It turns out the expert witness was a colleague of the surgeon. The case was dismissed.  Thoughts Having physicians dictate the outcome in medical malpractice cases is often viewed as inappropriate for several reasons: 1. Conflict of Interest: Physicians involved in malpractice cases may have inherent biases. Their professional identity can conflict with the objectivity needed to evaluate another physician’s actions. This can lead to favoritism or a lack of impartiality. 2. Lack of Legal Expertise: While physicians possess valuable medical knowledge, they may lack the legal training necessary to understand and apply the relevant laws and standards in a malpractice case. This can result in decisions that are not fully aligned with legal principles. 3. Complexity of Medical Standards: Medical malpractice cases often involve nuanced interpretations of the standard of care, which can vary based on the context and specifics of each case. Physicians may struggle to navigate these complexities without an understanding of legal frameworks. 4. Jury Perspectives: In cases involving physician oversight, juries may perceive that physician opinions carry too much weight, possibly leading to bias in judgment. Jurors may be influenced by the status of medical professionals rather than focusing solely on the evidence presented. 5. Detachment from Medical Reality: Physicians may not adequately consider the broader implications of their decisions on patient care or community standards. Decisions made solely by physicians might not reflect the wider ethical and social responsibilities inherent in medical practice. 6. Limiting Diverse Perspectives: Relying exclusively on physicians may restrict the diversity of opinions in a case. Legal experts, ethicists, and laypersons can bring valuable insights that enhance understanding and lead to more balanced outcomes. 7. Professional Solidarity: A culture of solidarity among physicians can undermine accountability and discourage whistleblowing on malpractice. This protective environment may result in biased assessments of professional conduct. 8. Patient Advocacy: Patients deserve representation, prioritizing their rights and welfare. Decisions should reflect a balance of medical insights and legal principles, which physicians might not provide alone. In summary, while physicians have critical knowledge of medical malpractice cases, relying exclusively on them to dictate outcomes can compromise the fairness and legality of the process. A multidisciplinary approach that includes legal experts and considers diverse perspectives is essential for achieving just outcomes in malpractice disputes. The importance of having attorney arbitrators in medical arbitrations cannot be overstated.

Fatal outcomes and a conflicting legal system. Expert Witness for medical malpractice case: The Medical Board! Read More »

international-patients

Latin America’s Healthcare: A Reality Check for International Patients.

Will it turn into a nightmare? …Not necessarily.  When considering medical treatment abroad, looking for institutions that hold World Council for Medical Tourism (WCMT) ISO Certification is crucial. Lack of External VerificationWhen choosing a destination, healthcare institution, or surgeon, seek board-certified professionals in their country who are trained in advanced techniques. The WCMT should verify their credentials to ensure high qualifications. While Latin America’s healthcare system typically provides comprehensive pre-surgery screenings and post-operative monitoring, the absence of national public verification due to insufficient human and technological resources and sometimes even corruption can leave patients at risk; this is also true in regions like India, Turkey, and Malaysia. The WCMT Training Program and ISO Verification Certificate aim to establish protocols, standards, and compliance systems to ensure the well-being of international patients. National Governance in Latin AmericaEach country in Latin America has local laws regulating safety, sanitation, and professional standards for healthcare institutions. However, insufficient government personnel often leads to many health institutions lacking valid or current licenses and permits. Each country has its Medical Certification Associations, which require rigorous training, certification exams, and ongoing education. While many surgeons hold certifications from internationally recognized boards, this is not always the case, and the legitimacy of such certifications can be questionable. Only the Cluster Medical de Puebla A.C. (PueblaCare) in Mexico has completed the Compliance Training Program and holds a Certificate of Verification of credentials and legal compliance. The WCMT ISO Verification Certification emphasizes safety protocols that are often overlooked or poorly implemented. Patient Value-Based- CareLatin American healthcare systems offer tailored procedures, multilingual staff, and holistic recovery options as part of a Value-Based-Care approach promoted by the WCMT. Why Safety for Patients and Physicians MattersAs medical tourism grows, Latin America has become a leading destination for international patients seeking affordable medical treatment from world-class physicians while surrounded by cultural attractions. However, safety and quality are major concerns for international patients unfamiliar with local healthcare systems and appropriate legal compliance. The WCMT verifies medical compliance standards, examines accreditations, evaluates surgeon qualifications, and assesses patient safety protocols, including recovery care and follow-up. By relying on WCMT verification, prospective patients can make informed decisions and confidently choose Latin American destinations for their medical needs. Accreditation and CertificationThe WCMT ISO Certification verifies legal and administrative compliance and the legitimacy of international accreditations, which are vital indicators of a healthcare institution’s commitment to excellence. The WCMT ISO Certification ensures operational efficiency, legal compliance, and adherence to international best practices and protocols, including those issued by the American Medical Association. The WCMT verifies the legitimacy and validity of any Quality Standard Accreditations. Modern Techniques and TelemedicineSome private healthcare institutions in Latin America boast advanced surgical equipment, robotics, and innovative methods to reduce risk and recovery time. However, there is often no external verification of the training certificates for medical technicians or surgeons using robotic or other modern equipment unless a neutral third party is contracted, which rarely occurs. Telemedicine and shared digital medical information are on the rise, yet there is limited understanding of each region’s international implications, legalities, liabilities, and requirements. Mitigating RiskUndergoing medical treatment Latin America can be safe when performed at reputable healthcare institutions that have verified legal, administrative, and protocol compliance. Many healthcare institutions in Latin America adhere to internationally recognized safety and quality standards yet often lack verification from an international third party. When selecting a healthcare institution, meticulous research, and due diligence are essential to ensure safety and quality during your medical journey. Infrastructure CapacityCountries like Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina have invested in state-of-the-art equipment and cutting-edge technology, resulting from their medical growth and international collaborations. Programs such as the WCMT Incubator Program can facilitate economic advancement through collaborations with pharmaceuticals, research laboratories, postgraduate academic programs, and foreign investment.

Latin America’s Healthcare: A Reality Check for International Patients. Read More »

Scroll to Top